I don’t need to see a financial statement before dining at a restaurant.
I mean this respectfully, and forgive me if I’m too passionate, former labor law person, but I have trouble understanding this pov and think it misunderstands the issue, especially given the history of tipped minimum wage and worker protections.
Employers aren’t legally allowed to keep the wages of their employees. I know tipping is weird and arcane, but with service charges, money that was legally required to go to specific employees now gets hoovered into to an opaque, unclear, loosely regulated system. We have tons of anecdotal reports from Kismet and Jon and Vinny’s employees that owners pocket some of the service charge. Not only does this shifts the balance of power away from workers, but ironically it’s all done under the guise of equity.
Maybe that’s fine and we should trust restaurant owners, but there’s a reason restaurant owners don’t disclose this. Most customers leave a tip, service charge, whatever the nomenclature to benefit the people waiting on them. Not the owners of the restaurant. That’s what, broadly, a service charge is for, and is the reason the tipped minimum wage is/was so low.
I get that it’s exhausting and unsustainable to investigate labor practices, but the law hasn’t caught up with this, and until it does, it’s valid to question. Would you patronize a restaurant violating child labor laws or convicted of wage theft? There’s a whole history of labor protections out of the New Deal/FLSA, preventing owners from exploiting workers. I get this isn’t quite that serious, but it smacks of that, and if restaurants owners are pocketing a tip/service charge, I’d like to know.
EDIT: I really do think they need to equalize front and back of house pay, but it’s tricky when things shift from an 18%/20% gratuity or whatever that I know legally goes to certain employees, waiters, to a system where service charges get distributed in opaque ways that allow the owners to keep whatever amount they want.