Sardines - Why Aren't they on Local Menus?

@Porthos The legacy of Porthos extends to the end of the earth.

I love sardines. With all the claims about over fishing and mercury and lead content, I’m wondering why sardines aren’t making it onto local menus. Sardine toast is obvious.

Are there any restaurants that offer sardines?

3 Likes

Gjusta
Kinjiro

3 Likes

Hamasaku serves iwashi as part of its omakase.

Cafe Angelino puts just the right amount of sardine on their Caesar salad (to great effect, I might add).

Thank you J_L.

It might be an anchovy that they put in the Caesar salad.

1 Like

Its a thing in Spain, but not a lot of people here are going to go to a restaurant to order seafood like sardines that comes in a tin.

There’s also the local sardines catch off the West Coast, but that catch has crashed hard- the sardine population is about 10% of what it was ten years ago.

It doesn’t make a lot of sense to me why people would want to eat sardines because of concerns about over fishing other fishes when the sardines are being over fished too.

http://www.seafoodwatch.org/seafood-recommendations/groups/sardine?q=Sardine&o=414

2 Likes

The “sardines” at Kinjiro are kibinago or silver striped herring.

1 Like

All over the Mediterranean, actually.

And Taiwan

1 Like

Sardine fishing has been banned in California:

All the claims about overfishing are bullshit propagated by anti-consumptivists – not true environmentalists. People who simply take issue with humans killing other animals for food.

Think about it – if they were honest about their true motive and rationale, they’d be trying to convince lawmakers to restrict/ban fishing because “it’s wrong to kill fish.” That’s not going to get a lot of takers.

But if they can trick everyone into thinking the oceans are barren and the future is iffy at best – all the politicians who want the “environmentalist” merit badge and innocent, unknowing voters will jump on board.

Real environmentalists are people who have a passion for the wild and are out there every day. These people feeding you these gloom and doom stories aren’t environmentalists, they just want to trick you into helping them take away the rights of fishermen and hunters. You can almost hear the glee in their voice as they talk about how there’ll be no fish left in fifty years… Pfft. Some “environmentalists.”

Sardines aren’t overfished. They’re a boom and bust species.

So now that we’re clear about that, I’ve had hundreds of chances to take home all the fresh sardines I could ever want and for whatever reason I never have. I know they’re very popular elsewhere, but for my palate, they’re just not desirable to me. I suspect most people feel that way, and it’s just hard to sell them. Plus, they’re pretty bony, so I imagine the processing is expensive.

1 Like

yeah, we talk about y’all at the meetings, ted, when we’re not busy controlling the media.

Who’s this shadowy “they” of whom you speak?

Nobody. Historically it might have been boom and bust, but the last ten years look like heading for extinction.

1 Like

Anti-consuptivists. I didn’t think I was being shadowy?

Robert, they’re not heading for extinction, that’s just the Oregon news outlet trying to sell papers to Oregonians who eat that stuff up.

They are a boom and bust species, this isn’t the first time in the last hundred years they’ve been “poised for extinction” and just like the other times, it comes on the heels of a massive El Nino and switching of the PDO. This bust was predicted for a long time. I don’t ever trust estimates of how many 6" fish are left in the entire Pacific ocean, but even if their 65,000 metric tons estimate is right, that’s 573 MILLION fish. For a resilient species with a population doubling time of about 2 years, that’s a solid breeding stock.

The fishing cutbacks aren’t because there aren’t enough fish left – it’s because you don’t want to kick them when they’re down due to the natural boom and bust cycles. In the early to mid 20th century, they made that mistake and kept fishing them very hard until they couldn’t catch anymore, and actually did threaten the species. Ten years later, there were plenty of sardines again.

Simply put, they’re not overfished, this collapse isn’t caused by or even contributed to by overfishing, and when they inevitably bounce back they’ll continue to be commercially exploited as every natural resource should be.

BTW if you do the math from that article, even though sardines have dropped (assuming the numbers they provide are accurate) by 90% just since 2007, had they only dropped by 75%, we’d not only be unconcerned, but we’d still be fishing for them. Saying we can’t fish them this year isn’t saying that they’re doomed and we’re screwed. That’s what those shadowy-anticonsumptivists will spin it as, however :wink:

1 Like

I’ve never heard of that term. Is it an organization or a description? I am unclear as to what or whom you are referring when you keep repeating “they” do this or that. Do you have any specifics?

It’s definitely as black and white as you describe it and recent scientific publications state that it is not as simple as you describe it. Just one example but SciFinder/PubMed shows other papers

The West Coast sardine fishery is closed by the government when the estimated population drops below 150,000 metric tons. The current estimate is 65,000. In 2007 it was almost 1,000,000.

Your conspiracy theory is fact-free nonsense.

2 Likes

obviously the guys who make the estimate are in on the conspiracy

:rolling_eyes: