No disrespect intended, but QR’s post seems a lot like bot posts an other board I frequent.
Hope you are a real person, QR.
No disrespect intended, but QR’s post seems a lot like bot posts an other board I frequent.
Hope you are a real person, QR.
Why would someone bother to create a bot ro promote talc?
people used to wonder the same thing about putting a computer into a watch…
People pay up to $800 for “smart” watches.
No idea. But the another board I’m on will intermittently and randomly have a newish user pop up w/ info on the thread subject, using the same sort of syntax.
I don’t know enough about bots to state that a real person created a bot specifically to talk about talc. Maybe the programming was more generalized.
But, again, hopefully I’m wrong.
Probably AI training. @QR_code, are you AI training?
And I think the mystery is solved…
Good spot @paranoidgarliclover
It was? I am slow, obviously.
The post that made it evident was deleted
LOL that QR liked this…
Only slower than AI bots and me reporting all of their posts (well, the second bots post, at least).
I didn’t report the bots post on Thailand recs b/c that might be useful. But I was conflicted b/c I don’t want bots “in the wild” learning from people… ::shudder::
So the David guy was a bot too?
I think so. Its initial post in the Swig thread was neatly typed and then the syntax and punctuation started to degrade exponentially. It was seriously wild.
Hard to tell spambots from limited-English human spammers until the bot writes something no human would.
We need a bot to work for us humans to help detect bots:
They are doing it all the time and in many cases nobody recognizes - as with every technology there are different level of quality companies behind it
I know. That’s perhaps what I find most disturbing of all…
Not really new - With the rise of social media, we humans have been the product for well over a decade (dare I even say two decades) now…
I’m gonna wait for the new user to prove me wrong about them being a bot…